Genus changed to Royoporus in 1997? Give us a break! It was a Polyporus since Schweinitz (1832), and why do polypores need so many genera anyway? Because people will pay to study them, I guess. But a new genus in 1997 for 3 species, based on a paper that found them in Calcutta? Well, it was one species until 1997, and now it is 3. But why would people want to let this Mr. He change the genus of this mushroom to one he erected, and then transferred one species a year to for three years. I could see no compelling reason to do so in his paper. He says that he proposes the change. Why would people pay attention to him? Imazeki already changed the genus to Polyporellus in 1989. What makes this name better? Bah, humbug.